Skip to content

‘Quran does not bar images of Prophet’

Wed 2015-Jan-14 @ MYT 03:18:29 am
TALIBAN LAW
The Koran does not prohibit figural imagery. Rather, it castigates the worship of idols… [In] Islamic law, there does not exist a single legal decree, or fatwa [that prohibits] images of the Prophet…the decree that comes closest was published online in 2001 by the Taliban

Christiane Gruber

 

Prophet Muhammad sitting with the Abrahamic prophets in Jerusalem, anonymous, Mi‘rajnama (Book of Ascension), Tabriz, ca. 1317-1330. Topkapı Palace Library


By Christiane Gruber
associate professor at the University of Michigan whose primary field of research is Islamic book arts, paintings of the Prophet Muhammad, and Islamic ascension texts and images.

Newsweek, Jan 9
In the wake of the massacre that took place in the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo, I have been called upon as a scholar specializing in Islamic paintings of the Prophet to explain whether images of Muhammad are banned in Islam.

The short and simple answer is no. The Koran does not prohibit figural imagery. Rather, it castigates the worship of idols, which are understood as concrete embodiments of the polytheistic beliefs that Islam supplanted when it emerged as a purely monotheistic faith in the Arabian Peninsula during the seventh century.

Moreover, the Hadith, or Sayings of the Prophet, present us with an ambiguous picture at best: At turns we read of artists dared to breathe life into their figures and, at others, of pillows ornamented with figural imagery.

If we turn to Islamic law, there does not exist a single legal decree, or fatwa, in the historical corpus that explicitly and decisively prohibits figural imagery, including images of the Prophet. While more recent online fatwas can surely be found, the decree that comes closest to articulating this type of ban was published online in 2001 by the Taliban, as they set out to destroy the Buddhas of Bamiyan.

In their fatwa, the Taliban decreed that all non-Islamic statues and shrines in Afghanistan be destroyed. However, this very modern decree remains entirely silent on the issue of figural images and sculptures within Islam, which, conversely, had been praised as beneficial and educational by Muhammad ‘Abduh, a prominent jurist in 19th century Egypt.

In sum, a search for a ban on images of Muhammad in pre-modern Islamic textual sources will yield no clear and firm results whatsoever. » READ MORE…

Christiane Gruber is currently writing her next book, The Praiseworthy One: The Prophet Muhammad in Islamic Texts and Images. Some of her other work:
Images of the Prophet Muhammad In and Out of Modernity: The Curious Case of a 2008 Mural in Tehran
The Image of the Prophet between Ideal and Ideology: A Scholarly Investigation

4 Comments
  1. Wed 2015-Jan-14 @ MYT 03:21:17 am 03:21

    my jaw hit the floor when I read this, I cannot believe it. I’m sharing this with everyone I know.

  2. Shadaan permalink
    Wed 2015-Jan-14 @ MYT 12:22:05 pm 12:22

    If religion is not the worship of a thing made by the hand, then is it the worship of something made by the mind? We also have an idea of what God is, and that idea is created by the mind. The idol is made by the mind through the hand, and the idea of God is made and held in the mind as something amazing, to be worshipped more like the sacred idol. Both the idea and the idol are made by the mind. This is the God invented by the human mind. Five religions or more and five Gods have created divisions amongst us and conflict. We can keep fighting each other forever, all we are going to see is more conflict and anger. Wake up to the facts rather than the letting the blind lead you.

Trackbacks

  1. Charlie Hebdo’s new cover says ‘All is forgiven’ | uppercaise
  2. How I drew the new Charlie Hebdo cover – Luz | uppercaise

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: